A letter of support is a formal endorsement from a key stakeholder, partner organization, community leader, or other credible source that validates your project’s importance, confirms your organization’s capacity, and demonstrates community backing for your funding request. Here’s a comprehensive example followed by detailed analysis of effective letter components.
Sample Letter of Support
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
1425 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard
Riverside, CA 92507
(951) 555-0123
www.riversidehealth.org
[Date]
Ms. Jennifer Rodriguez, Program Officer
California Community Foundation
221 South Figueroa Street, Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Dear Ms. Rodriguez,
I am writing to provide strong support for the Esperanza Family Services’ proposal to the California Community Foundation for their “Building Bridges: Comprehensive Support for Immigrant Families” program. As Chief Executive Officer of Riverside Community Health Center, I have worked closely with Esperanza Family Services for over eight years and can personally attest to their exceptional capacity to serve our community’s most vulnerable populations.
The need for comprehensive immigrant family support services in our community is both urgent and well-documented. In our health center alone, we serve over 2,400 immigrant families annually, many of whom struggle with language barriers, economic instability, and limited access to essential services. Through our partnership with Esperanza Family Services, we have witnessed firsthand how their culturally competent approach dramatically improves family stability and child welfare outcomes. Last year, families participating in their programming showed 40% higher rates of preventive healthcare utilization and 60% improvement in housing stability compared to families receiving services elsewhere.
Esperanza Family Services brings unique qualifications to this work that distinguish them from other organizations in our region. Their bilingual, bicultural staff includes several team members who are themselves immigrants, creating authentic connections with participants that foster trust and engagement. Their wraparound service model addresses multiple family needs simultaneously rather than forcing families to navigate separate programs, which has proven particularly effective for families facing complex challenges. Most importantly, their commitment to community leadership development means that program participants become advocates and leaders who continue supporting other families long after completing formal programming.
As part of this proposed project, Riverside Community Health Center commits to providing the following support:
- Weekly on-site health education workshops led by our bilingual health educators, valued at approximately $15,000 annually
- Priority appointment scheduling for program participants, ensuring access to medical, dental, and mental health services
- Care coordination services that help families navigate complex healthcare systems and maintain continuity of care
- Space for monthly family support groups at our community wellness center at no charge to the program
- Data sharing (with appropriate consents) to track health outcomes and support comprehensive evaluation of program effectiveness
Our partnership will enhance program effectiveness while extending our own capacity to address social determinants of health that significantly impact our patients’ wellbeing. We have found that families receiving comprehensive support services through Esperanza demonstrate better medication adherence, keep more appointments, and show improved management of chronic conditions compared to families receiving healthcare services alone.
The broader community impact of this program extends well beyond direct participants. Esperanza’s approach to building community leadership capacity has resulted in increased civic engagement, with program graduates serving on school boards, neighborhood councils, and advocacy organizations that benefit all residents. Their work directly contributes to creating more inclusive, equitable communities where all families can thrive.
I have been particularly impressed by Esperanza’s commitment to accountability and continuous improvement. Their evaluation systems provide reliable data about program effectiveness, and they consistently use findings to refine their approaches and improve outcomes. Their track record of successful grant management includes completing projects on time and within budget while exceeding performance targets, which gives me confidence that this investment will be managed responsibly and produce meaningful results.
The proposed “Building Bridges” program represents exactly the type of comprehensive, community-based intervention our region needs to address persistent inequities affecting immigrant families. Esperanza Family Services has both the vision and the capacity to implement this work successfully, and their partnership approach will create lasting systems change that benefits our entire community.
I strongly encourage the California Community Foundation to fund this important initiative. Please feel free to contact me at (951) 555-0123 or [email protected] if you need any additional information about our partnership or the community need this program will address.
Sincerely,
Dr. Maria Elena Garcia, MD, MPH
Chief Executive Officer
Riverside Community Health Center
Analysis of Effective Letter Components
Professional Header and Format establishes credibility through official letterhead, complete contact information, proper date, and full funder address. This attention to detail demonstrates professionalism and makes it easy for funders to verify the letter’s authenticity.
Specific Salutation addresses the program officer by name when known, showing that the letter writer has taken time to research the appropriate contact person rather than using generic greetings.
Clear Opening Statement immediately identifies the writer’s position, relationship to the applying organization, and specific support for the funding request. This paragraph establishes the writer’s credibility and authority to provide meaningful endorsement.
Credible Need Validation provides independent confirmation of the problem the project addresses, using the letter writer’s own data and experience rather than simply repeating information from the proposal. This third-party validation strengthens the case for funding.
Specific Organizational Endorsement includes concrete examples of the applying organization’s strengths, past achievements, and demonstrated capacity rather than generic praise. The letter cites specific statistics and outcomes that build credibility.
Concrete Partnership Commitments detail exactly what support the letter writer’s organization will provide, including dollar values when possible. These specific commitments demonstrate serious partnership while potentially counting toward matching fund requirements.
Community Impact Evidence describes broader benefits beyond direct participants, showing understanding of systemic change and long-term community development that many funders prioritize.
Track Record Documentation provides specific examples of successful collaboration and past performance that build confidence in the applying organization’s ability to deliver promised results.
Future Vision Integration connects the proposed project to broader community improvement goals, showing how this funding will contribute to lasting positive change rather than temporary solutions.
Professional Closing reiterates support, provides contact information for follow-up questions, and maintains appropriate business letter format throughout.
Key Elements of Strong Support Letters
Writer Credibility comes from relevant experience, recognized expertise, community standing, or direct knowledge of the applying organization’s work. The most effective letters come from sources whose opinions carry weight with funders.
Specific Knowledge about the applying organization, proposed project, and community need demonstrates genuine familiarity rather than superficial support. Effective letters include concrete examples and specific details that could only come from authentic engagement.
Independent Perspective provides validation from sources other than the applying organization, offering external confirmation of need, capacity, and potential impact that strengthens the overall proposal.
Concrete Commitments specify exactly what support will be provided, whether through financial contributions, in-kind services, partnership activities, or other assistance that enhances project implementation.
Community Context demonstrates understanding of local conditions, population characteristics, and service landscape that supports the project’s relevance and importance within the specific community context.
Types of Effective Letter Writers
Partner Organizations provide the strongest letters when they can speak to direct collaboration experience, shared service populations, or complementary programming that enhances project effectiveness.
Community Leaders including elected officials, business leaders, religious leaders, or civic organization heads offer credibility through their standing and community knowledge while demonstrating broad-based support.
Target Population Representatives provide authentic voices from communities that will be served, offering unique perspectives on need, cultural appropriateness, and community readiness for proposed interventions.
Subject Matter Experts from academic institutions, research organizations, or professional associations can validate your approach, methodology, or expected outcomes based on their specialized knowledge.
Former Funders who have supported your organization previously can speak to your track record, fiscal responsibility, and ability to deliver promised results based on direct experience.
Government Officials demonstrate alignment with public priorities and may indicate potential for ongoing support or policy backing that enhances sustainability prospects.
Common Letter Strengths and Weaknesses
Strong Letters include specific examples, concrete commitments, independent validation of need, demonstrated knowledge of the applying organization, and clear connection to the writer’s expertise or experience.
Weak Letters use generic language that could apply to any organization, provide vague expressions of support without specific commitments, lack detailed knowledge of the proposed project, or come from sources with questionable credibility or relevance.
Authenticity Indicators include specific details that demonstrate genuine knowledge, references to actual collaboration or interaction, concrete examples of the organization’s work, and language that reflects the writer’s authentic voice rather than template content.
Red Flags include letters that appear to be written by the applying organization, generic content that could describe any project, unsupported claims about impact or capacity, or inappropriate promises about resources or support.
Letter Solicitation Best Practices
Early Planning allows adequate time for relationship building, letter development, and quality review before proposal deadlines. Quality letters require sufficient preparation time and should not be rushed.
Clear Instructions help letter writers understand what information is needed, how letters should be formatted, when they’re due, and how they should be submitted to ensure compliance with funder requirements.
Relationship Building may be necessary before soliciting letters, particularly from new contacts who need to understand your work and develop confidence in your organization before providing endorsement.
Strategic Selection focuses on letter writers whose endorsement will carry the most weight with specific funders while ensuring diversity of perspectives and types of support.
Follow-Up Coordination ensures that promised letters are received on time and meet quality standards while maintaining positive relationships with supporters who invest time in providing endorsements.
Integration with Proposal Strategy
Narrative Reinforcement occurs when support letters confirm and expand upon claims made in the proposal narrative, providing external validation for key points about need, capacity, and expected impact.
Gap Filling allows letters to address aspects of the project or organization that may not fit naturally in other proposal sections, providing additional context or perspectives that strengthen the overall case.
Partnership Documentation demonstrates concrete collaborative relationships rather than abstract commitments, showing that other organizations are genuinely invested in project success.
Community Engagement Evidence proves that the project reflects genuine community input and stakeholder involvement rather than top-down planning by demonstrating broad-based support and participation.
Effective letters of support provide powerful third-party validation that significantly strengthens grant proposals by offering independent confirmation of organizational credibility, community need, and project importance. When solicited strategically and crafted authentically, these endorsements create compelling evidence that respected community members and organizations believe in your work and are willing to stake their reputations on your success.
Like this tip? Check out my grant writing books, courses and newsletter.
Was this answer helpful? Share it now:
