Grant submission guidelines are the specific requirements and instructions that funders provide for how they want grant applications submitted, formatted, and structured. These guidelines serve as the rulebook for the entire application process, covering everything from technical specifications to content requirements. Following these guidelines precisely is crucial for nonprofits, as failure to comply often results in automatic rejection regardless of your project’s merit or organizational capacity.
Core Components of Submission Guidelines
Application Format Requirements specify whether you need to submit online through a portal, via email, or by mail. Many foundations now use online systems like Submittable, GrantHub, Fluxx, or their own custom platforms. Pay close attention to file format requirements (PDF, Word, Excel), naming conventions for documents, and any restrictions on file sizes or combined document submissions.
Deadline Information includes not just the date but the specific time and time zone when applications are due. Some funders accept applications on a rolling basis, while others have strict annual, quarterly, or semi-annual deadlines. Note whether the requirement is “postmarked by,” “received by,” or “submitted electronically by” a specific time, as these distinctions can be critical.
Required Documents typically include your proposal narrative, budget, organizational information, and supporting materials. Common requirements include IRS determination letter proving 501(c)(3) status, current board of directors list, most recent audited financial statements or Form 990, letters of support from key stakeholders, project timeline, and detailed evaluation plan.
Optional Documents may be welcomed but not required, such as additional letters of support, detailed program materials, organizational charts, or supplementary research. Guidelines usually specify whether optional materials are encouraged and how they should be submitted.
Content Structure and Requirements
Narrative Sections are typically specified in detail, with funders outlining exactly what they want included in each section. This might include executive summary, statement of need, project description, organizational capacity, goals and objectives, evaluation plan, sustainability plan, and budget narrative.
Page Limits are strictly enforced by most funders, with specific limits for each section or overall document length. Some funders provide word count limits instead of page limits, while others specify both. These limits are usually non-negotiable and exceeding them often results in automatic disqualification.
Question Formats vary widely among funders. Some provide specific questions to answer, others offer broad topic areas for discussion, and many use hybrid approaches with both required questions and open narrative sections. Online applications often use form fields with character limits for responses.
Section Organization requirements specify the order in which information should be presented and how sections should be labeled or numbered. Some funders require specific headings, while others allow flexibility in organization as long as all required content is included.
Formatting and Technical Specifications
Font and Typography Requirements typically specify acceptable fonts (often Times New Roman, Arial, or Calibri), minimum font sizes (usually 11-12 point), line spacing (commonly 1.15 or 1.5), and margin specifications (typically 1-inch margins). These requirements ensure readability and fair comparison among applications.
Document Layout Standards may include requirements for headers and footers, page numbering, title pages, table of contents for longer proposals, and consistent formatting throughout all documents. Some funders provide templates that must be used exactly as provided.
Visual Elements Guidelines address the use of charts, graphs, tables, images, and other visual components. Some funders welcome visual elements that enhance understanding, while others prefer text-only submissions. Guidelines typically specify acceptable file formats and quality standards for any graphics.
Accessibility Requirements increasingly important for ensuring proposals can be read by individuals with disabilities. This might include requirements for alternative text for images, proper heading structures, sufficient color contrast, and compatibility with screen readers.
Budget Requirements and Financial Documentation
Budget Format Specifications vary significantly among funders. Some want detailed line-item budgets showing every expense category, others prefer summary formats showing major cost areas, and many require both detailed budgets and narrative explanations of budget calculations.
Multi-Year Budget Presentation for projects spanning multiple years should show both annual breakdowns and cumulative totals. Some funders want separate budgets for each year, while others prefer single documents showing progression over time.
Matching Funds Documentation requirements include specifications for how to document cash and in-kind contributions from your organization and other sources. Guidelines typically explain how to value in-kind contributions and what documentation is needed to verify matching commitments.
Indirect Cost Policies explain how overhead or administrative costs should be calculated and presented. Some funders allow specific percentages for indirect costs, others require detailed justification for administrative expenses, and some prohibit indirect costs entirely.
Submission Process Details
Online Platform Instructions for electronic submissions include account creation requirements, navigation guidance, technical requirements for browsers and devices, and troubleshooting information for common problems. Many platforms allow draft saving and collaborative editing by multiple team members.
Physical Submission Requirements for funders still accepting hard copies specify how many copies to submit, required binding or presentation methods, shipping or delivery instructions, and whether original signatures are required on specific documents.
Confirmation Procedures explain how you’ll know your application was received successfully, whether you’ll receive automatic confirmation emails, and what to do if you don’t receive expected confirmation within specified timeframes.
Technical Support Availability information includes contact details for help with submission problems, available support hours, and whether technical assistance is available close to deadline periods.
Application Development Guidance
Pre-Application Requirements might include mandatory letters of inquiry, concept papers, or preliminary applications that must be approved before full proposal submission. Some funders require attendance at information sessions or completion of online training modules.
Collaboration and Partnership Expectations explain requirements for involving community partners, other organizations, or specific stakeholder groups in project development and implementation. Guidelines may specify how partnerships should be documented and what role partners should play.
Innovation and Evidence Expectations address how funders balance support for innovative approaches with requirements for evidence-based practices. Guidelines often explain what types of evidence they consider acceptable and how to present research supporting your approach.
Evaluation and Measurement Standards specify what types of evaluation approaches are expected, what data collection and analysis methods are acceptable, and how results should be measured and reported throughout the grant period.
Review Process Information
Timeline Expectations explain when you can expect to hear about funding decisions, whether interim communications will occur during review periods, and what factors might affect review timelines. This information helps with planning and expectation management.
Review Criteria outline how proposals will be evaluated, what factors reviewers will consider most important, and how scoring or ranking systems work. Understanding review criteria helps you emphasize elements that matter most to decision-makers.
Reviewer Composition information about who will review your proposal helps you understand their likely expertise, perspectives, and information needs. Some funders use staff review, others employ external experts, and many use combination approaches.
Decision Communication procedures explain how funding decisions will be communicated, what information will be provided to both successful and unsuccessful applicants, and whether feedback will be available to help improve future applications.
Post-Submission Expectations
Modification Policies explain whether and how you can make changes to submitted applications, what approval processes are required for modifications, and what types of changes are acceptable versus those that require complete resubmission.
Interview or Site Visit Possibilities prepare you for additional review steps that some funders employ for finalist organizations. Guidelines explain what to expect, how to prepare, and what role these additional steps play in final decision-making.
Award Notification Procedures detail how you’ll be notified if selected for funding, what information will be provided, and what immediate steps will be required to accept and begin implementing grants.
Reporting and Compliance Requirements preview the ongoing obligations that come with grant awards, including reporting schedules, financial documentation requirements, and performance measurement expectations that will apply throughout the grant period.
Common Guideline Variations
Government Versus Foundation Guidelines differ significantly in complexity and requirements. Government guidelines tend to be longer, more detailed, and include extensive regulatory requirements, while foundation guidelines are often shorter and more focused on program content.
Funding Amount Influences on guideline complexity, with larger grants typically requiring more detailed applications, extensive documentation, and rigorous review processes compared to smaller grant opportunities.
Application Type Differences between general operating support, project-specific funding, capacity building grants, and special initiatives affect guideline content and requirements. Each funding type emphasizes different aspects of organizational capacity and project design.
Funder Size and Sophistication influences guideline complexity, with larger, more established funders typically having more detailed and standardized guidelines compared to smaller or newer foundations.
Compliance and Risk Management
Regulatory Requirements particularly for government funders include compliance with federal regulations about civil rights, environmental protection, labor standards, and other legal requirements that may affect project implementation.
Intellectual Property Considerations explain ownership of materials developed with grant funds, requirements for crediting funders in publications or presentations, and any restrictions on how project results can be used or shared.
Audit and Monitoring Expectations preview the potential for financial audits, site visits, or other oversight activities that may occur during grant implementation, helping you understand compliance requirements and record-keeping needs.
Ethical Standards requirements include conflict of interest policies, requirements for institutional review board approval for research involving human subjects, and expectations for ethical conduct in program implementation.
Strategic Approach to Guidelines
Early Review and Planning involves obtaining guidelines well before deadlines to allow adequate preparation time, identify any capacity building needed to meet requirements, and plan collaborative efforts if partnerships are required or beneficial.
Question and Clarification Processes explain how to get help understanding guideline requirements, whether funders accept questions about guidelines, and what types of technical assistance may be available during application development.
Competitive Intelligence gathering involves understanding how guideline requirements might affect the applicant pool, what types of organizations are likely to compete successfully, and how to position your application within the competitive landscape.
Resource Allocation Planning uses guideline requirements to estimate the time, expertise, and resources needed for application development, helping you decide whether pursuing specific opportunities makes strategic sense for your organization.
Grant submission guidelines represent the contract between funders and applicants about expectations, requirements, and processes. Understanding and following these guidelines precisely demonstrates respect for funders’ time and processes while ensuring that your application receives fair consideration.
Organizations that excel at guideline compliance often find that this attention to detail becomes a competitive advantage, as many applications are eliminated simply for failing to follow basic requirements. The investment in carefully reading, understanding, and following guidelines pays dividends both in funding success rates and in building positive relationships with funders who appreciate professional, detail-oriented applicants.
Like this tip? Check out my grant writing books, courses and newsletter.
Was this answer helpful? Share it now:
