Grant applications typically require a comprehensive package of supporting documents that provide evidence, validation, and detailed information beyond what can be included in the main proposal narrative. These attachments serve to verify organizational legitimacy, demonstrate fiscal responsibility, validate claims made in the proposal, and provide additional context that enables informed funding decisions. The specific attachments required vary significantly among funders, making careful review of application guidelines essential for compliance.
Required vs. Optional Attachments
Mandatory Attachments are explicitly required by funder guidelines and failure to include them typically results in automatic proposal rejection. These requirements vary by funder but commonly include fundamental organizational documents that establish legitimacy and capacity. Missing any required attachment often disqualifies proposals regardless of their quality or merit.
Optional Attachments are those that funders welcome but don’t require, such as additional letters of support, supplementary research, detailed program materials, or organizational charts that enhance understanding but aren’t essential for evaluation. Strategic inclusion of optional materials can strengthen proposals without overwhelming reviewers.
Conditional Requirements may apply based on specific circumstances, such as audited financial statements for organizations above certain budget thresholds, partnership agreements for collaborative projects, or specialized certifications for particular types of programming.
Core Organizational Documents
IRS Determination Letter proving tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code is required by virtually all foundation and government funders. This document must be the most recent version available, and organizations should request updated letters from the IRS if their determination letters are very old or contain outdated information.
Board of Directors List provides current information about governance leadership including names, titles, organizational affiliations, and relevant expertise. Include brief biographical information that demonstrates board members’ qualifications and community connections while ensuring accuracy of all contact information and professional details.
Organizational Chart shows staffing structure, reporting relationships, and key positions within your organization. This document helps funders understand organizational capacity while showing how grant-funded positions will fit into existing structures and decision-making processes.
Articles of Incorporation and organizational bylaws provide legal foundation documents that establish your organization’s existence, purpose, and governance structure. Include current versions that reflect any recent amendments or updates to organizational structure or mission.
Mission Statement and organizational fact sheet provide context about your organization’s purpose, history, and current activities. While this information may appear in your proposal narrative, a separate one-page organizational profile can provide additional detail and professional presentation.
Financial Documentation Requirements
Audited Financial Statements from the most recent fiscal year provide independent verification of your organization’s financial condition and are required by most major funders. These documents should be prepared by certified public accountants and include management letters addressing any findings or recommendations.
Form 990 from the most recent tax year shows detailed financial information and programmatic activities as reported to the IRS. This public document provides transparency about organizational operations, executive compensation, and financial management while demonstrating compliance with federal reporting requirements.
Current Year Operating Budget shows planned revenues and expenses for the current fiscal year, demonstrating financial planning capacity while providing context for understanding your organization’s current financial position and the proposed project‘s place within overall operations.
Financial Policies Documentation may include procurement policies, conflict of interest statements, financial management procedures, or audit committee charters that demonstrate appropriate fiscal controls and professional financial management practices.
Bank Letters or financial institution statements may be required to verify organizational banking relationships, cash reserves, or line of credit availability, particularly for larger grants or organizations with limited operating history.
Program and Capacity Documentation
Organizational Strategic Plan demonstrates long-term thinking and shows how the proposed project fits within broader organizational goals. Include executive summaries of current strategic plans rather than complete documents unless specifically requested by funders.
Program Evaluation Reports from recent initiatives provide evidence of your organization’s effectiveness and capacity to achieve promised outcomes. Include executive summaries of evaluation reports that show positive results and lessons learned from previous work.
Annual Reports from recent years demonstrate organizational transparency, community engagement, and communication capacity while providing comprehensive overviews of programs, finances, and achievements that supplement other required documents.
Client Testimonials or participant feedback documentation offers authentic voices from people who have benefited from your services. Select testimonials that are relevant to the proposed project while protecting client confidentiality through appropriate permissions and anonymization.
Media Coverage documentation including newspaper articles, newsletter features, or other media attention demonstrates community awareness and recognition of your organizational work and impact.
Project-Specific Materials
Logic Model or theory of change diagram provides visual representation of your project’s approach and expected outcomes. While logic models may be integrated into proposal narratives, separate detailed versions can show sophisticated planning and evaluation thinking.
Detailed Project Timeline beyond what appears in the main proposal can show comprehensive planning and realistic implementation schedules. Include milestone charts, activity schedules, or Gantt charts that demonstrate thorough preparation and project management capacity.
Curriculum Materials or program guides demonstrate that you have developed or adapted evidence-based interventions for your proposed project. Include sample lesson plans, training modules, or participant handbooks that show program quality and readiness.
Evaluation Instruments such as surveys, assessment tools, or data collection protocols show that you have planned systematic approaches to measuring project effectiveness. Include samples of validated instruments or examples of data collection forms.
Partnership Agreements or memoranda of understanding provide concrete evidence of collaborative relationships that support project implementation. Include signed agreements that specify partner roles, responsibilities, and resource contributions.
Staffing and Personnel Information
Key Personnel Resumes for project leadership positions demonstrate relevant experience and qualifications. Include complete resumes for project directors, principal investigators, or other key staff who will have major implementation responsibilities.
Job Descriptions for grant-funded positions show that you have thoughtfully planned staffing needs and understand the qualifications required for project success. Include detailed descriptions that specify duties, qualifications, and reporting relationships.
Letters of Commitment from key staff or consultants who will work on the project provide assurance that qualified personnel are available and committed to project implementation.
Organizational Personnel Policies may be requested to demonstrate professional human resource management, including hiring procedures, professional development policies, or performance evaluation systems.
Letters of Support and Endorsement
Partner Organization Letters from agencies that will collaborate directly on project implementation should specify the nature of partnerships, resources partners will contribute, and how collaboration will enhance project effectiveness.
Community Leader Endorsements provide credibility through support from respected individuals like elected officials, business leaders, religious leaders, or community advocates who can speak to local need and organizational capacity.
Target Population Representatives offer authentic voices from communities you propose to serve, providing powerful testimony about need, cultural appropriateness, and community readiness for your intervention.
Professional References from colleagues in your field, former funders, or recognized experts provide credibility about your organization’s competence and the project’s alignment with best practices.
Government Official Support demonstrates alignment with public priorities and may indicate potential for ongoing support or policy backing that enhances project sustainability.
Legal and Compliance Documentation
Insurance Certificates may be required to demonstrate appropriate liability coverage, especially for projects involving direct service delivery, events, or facility use. Include general liability, professional liability, and directors and officers insurance as appropriate.
Licenses and Certifications relevant to your programmatic work demonstrate compliance with professional standards and regulatory requirements. This might include social work licenses, educational accreditation, health department permits, or other professional certifications.
Nondiscrimination Policies demonstrate commitment to inclusive service delivery and compliance with civil rights requirements. Many funders require evidence of policies that ensure equal access regardless of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics.
Human Subjects Protection documentation including Institutional Review Board approval may be required for projects involving research with human participants, particularly those conducted in partnership with academic institutions.
Technology and Infrastructure Documentation
Technology Plan or systems documentation may be relevant for projects requiring significant technology infrastructure, including network capabilities, software requirements, or digital equity considerations.
Facility Documentation including lease agreements, facility descriptions, or accessibility compliance certificates may be required for projects involving significant facility use or modification.
Equipment Inventory or procurement plans for projects requiring significant equipment purchases, including specifications, vendor information, and useful life considerations.
Submission Format and Organization
Digital File Requirements typically specify acceptable formats like PDF, Word, or Excel for different document types. Some platforms require specific file naming conventions or have limitations on file sizes that affect document preparation strategies.
Document Organization should follow funder guidelines for submission order, labeling systems, or packaging requirements. Some funders require single combined files while others prefer separate documents clearly labeled according to their specifications.
Quality Standards ensure that all documents are current, professionally presented, error-free, and properly formatted. Poor document quality can undermine even strong organizational capacity and excellent programming.
Backup Documentation should be maintained for all submitted materials, including original files, email confirmations, and submission receipts that verify successful delivery within required timeframes.
Common Submission Mistakes
Missing Required Documents typically result in automatic proposal rejection regardless of proposal quality. Create comprehensive checklists to ensure all mandatory materials are included and properly formatted according to funder specifications.
Outdated Information undermines credibility and suggests poor organizational record-keeping. Regularly update supporting documents and ensure all materials reflect current organizational status, leadership, and financial condition.
Poor Document Quality including illegible scans, incomplete documents, or unprofessional formatting reflects poorly on organizational capacity and attention to detail that funders consider indicators of implementation capability.
Inconsistent Information between supporting documents and proposal narratives creates credibility concerns and suggests poor preparation or inaccurate information that could affect funding decisions.
Inappropriate Materials that don’t relate to the funding request or exceed reasonable documentation needs can overwhelm reviewers and obscure important information that supports your proposal.
Strategic Attachment Selection
Relevance Screening ensures that included documents directly support your proposal and provide value to reviewers rather than including materials that are tangentially related or don’t strengthen your case for funding.
Quality Over Quantity principles favor fewer high-quality, relevant documents over comprehensive collections that may overwhelm busy reviewers who have limited time for thorough document review.
Funder Alignment considers what types of documentation will be most persuasive to specific funders based on their priorities, review processes, and organizational culture.
Professional Presentation through consistent formatting, clear labeling, and error-free documents reflects organizational competence and respect for reviewer time and attention.
Understanding attachment requirements and preparing comprehensive, high-quality supporting documentation significantly strengthens grant proposals by providing the evidence and context that enable informed funding decisions. These documents transform abstract claims into verified facts while demonstrating the organizational capacity and professional standards that funders seek in their charitable investment partners.
Success requires treating attachment preparation as seriously as proposal writing, investing adequate time in gathering current documents, ensuring professional presentation, and verifying compliance with all funder requirements. When done well, supporting attachments create confidence that your organization can handle the administrative requirements and accountability expectations that accompany grant funding.
Like this tip? Check out my grant writing books, courses and newsletter.
Was this answer helpful? Share it now:
